Thursday, December 10, 2009

South Park Watch On Quicktime

Tenth Day d 'Round Round

BFT - Black Eyed Pink
6-1
Stefano (2), own goal, netting, GP, Giorgio.


game one way to tonight at Bern, where the hosts start strong thanks to a certain Stefano Boscolo took the pole at zero minutes already allowed to foresee a good evening. Guests by showing them a bit 'embarrassed with the ball at his feet and they just try and defend conclusions from a distance. No wonder then that the door of the BFT remain untouched for much of the game, it 'that we need to see a rigorous Beppe Jr beat. In the final game of a pleasant though not close, but above all to put another 3 points in the bag.


BEPPE Jr vote 9 work has had and was simply impeccable. Of course, lack the icing on the 'unlikely penalty awarded to the opponents, but this evening has closed all the spaces: it has walled in' one on one, he opposed the shots from near and far and it is also possible to deflect a shot with sudden split by a dancer, which makes us think that perhaps it is only provided to the football 5. The wall

vote 8 PIECE holding the reins of the defense and diligent 'director back in action for much of the game. It does not notice the 'absence of the Panda and the second is stubbornly marking time staff. Genius and regolatezza

TRACK 6.5 vote on the bench for technical choice, but when I enter gives a solid performance and gives security and stability to the team. Unfortunately not able to frame the opponent's goal and perhaps that smacks of unbridled self-interest during a counterattack against a 3: lose the 'opportunity to pass, they lose the' opportunity to score and also lost votes in half report card. Security

ROB 7 vote on trust, because you do not see much in the field, but still has time to make a buck or two in the field and provide the 'assist' s own-goal opponent. Precious

TOSO vote 6 enters two finals time already when the game does not have much to say and does not add anything. Apart from a couple of assists and missed a shot to the stars is likely to be remembered for having cursed unaware of having the 'referee behind. (slightly) Environmental

GIORGIO vote 8 Tex if he plays the owner and he can not repent of choice: defend and precise in order to build never loses his head back there with pieces. Proves out to be positive when the period goes on offense: pricks with a goal of power and a lob cuteness that does not fit a narrow margin. Revelation


GP 7.5 rating
beaten in attack coach decides to become the worst enemy of the enemy attacking the ball carrier like a rabid hound. Just when you began to have doubts about the 'effectiveness of this tactic here is that the captain of the opposing defense gets an early Christmas present in the form of collective sleep. He is quick to exploit an opponent and jumping at the same time taking the ball on the right, which can then explode a low shot murderous post and goals, the rest is history. Sturm und Drang


BEPPE 6.5 Party vote in the licensed band multimillion all over the 'attack and have to say that undermines more than once in the opponent's defense. Mindful of the board of Tex in training anticipates the conclusion, but unfortunately the goal did not arrive, even when he puts down the goalkeeper. Godot

STEFANO vote 9 Like the proverbial comet driving mates to a win with ease. Ready on, the second hand has not done a tour and already the opposing goal post shakes. He is not discouraged and continued to dictate his game by finding two beautiful goals and seeing the defender to steal the third avvesrario. After the one-two staff wearing Santa Claus clothes and began to create spaces and turning out to assist mates, and in general it is easy to see how his presence in the field provide security and allow you to play with more fluency. Bomberissimo

Chevy Silverado Xd Wheels



vs BFT. ACADEMY ITALY
8-2

SCORERS: 3 Panda , 3 Stephen, Rob 1, 1 Giorgio

The perfect match: we think in 50 minutes and were concentrated in defense until the last second. We can be satisfied with this performance that has earned three valuable points against a team very technical and fast. A few smudges in defense and a cynical attack allowed us to manage the game without too much concern: After a fairly balanced first half, we have placed the decisive part in the middle shooting confounding opponents who are disunited and have suffered a boat truly unexpected. Of course we are a strange team ... the last two games were thrown to the wind when we could put the grim sight this evening. It 'true that in the past we have granted many absences, but it is equally true that this morning all we fielded a desire which is the main ingredient to aspire to victory and that should never miss. It should, of course ...

BEPPE jr. 8 vote really good performance of the second goalkeeper of the BFT. Committing only one error at the first goal and when we think it is not perfect opponents to pardon reborn

ALE: 8 vote falls just in time for the derby sentitissimo family and triumphs with the experience and sense of place. Give peace of mind even if the team does not guarantee the thrust of the best times welcome back

PIECE: vote 7 forced to hold fails to appear much on offense. Behind the right plays with malice and also tries to set up, but not enough geometric sacrificed

PANDA: vote 9
always in on the action, the team can handle it with skill: is wonderfully with Stephen B and not content to score three: earns punishment and provides numerous assists for his teammates. irreplaceable

GIORGIO: 7.5
early voting is not the best because the ball is not wasting a wonderful opportunity, builds quickly with a goal left in the mixture that starts the ball rolling underestimated

ROB: 7.5 vote taken on the bench for the entire first half, enters in the second half and appeared to sheepishly feeling the pinch. It eats almost made a goal into an empty net but in the long and growing signs a goal by applause heard

TOSO: 6.5 votes kept in mothballs for the entire first half, when they would enter eat the ball. Vigorously fought for every ball after the blunders of the latest entries decides it's time to erect a wall and its share is not passed. Provides a pair of assists, but chooses evidently evil greedy recipients ring (T) oso

GP: 2 votes no longer report cards, pull the pack-match and who knows what else. But washing the uniforms of the entire team would like to thank friends for their help horned and bouquets

BEPPE: vote 6 pay the entrance tinker too cold when not kick on goal. He lost one on one too many conflicts in the first half. In the second half, when the spaces are wider, but given the growing changes in the desert preaching disappointed

STEFANO: vote 9 Seeing him play it seems that the geometry of the five a side football is a simple child's play. Panda shape with a couple amazing, sensational as are the three goals that the rampant spread of the Academy boys. Shakes the intersection of the poles with a torpedo that deserved better luck seratona

Wednesday, September 30, 2009

Gpsphone Fire Red Cheat

provide web space to a prostitute is not a crime

from http:/ / punto-informatico.it/2710555/PI/Interviste/italia-intermediario-non-responsabile.aspx

Hosting advertising, web space and provide assistance to those alleged to have committed a crime does not mean though there be co-responsible ' is a direct economic return. The ruling of the GIP Rome, the interview with the lawyer Sarzana

Rome - The crime of prostitution does not invest those that provide online registration services for domain names, hosting, site maintenance to persons suspected of having committed the crime, competition are not responsible for the crime of pimping online site owners who are paid to host a banner through which it is proposed commercialization of bodies. The responsibility is not unfolding chain of suppliers of services to determine, a ruling that the Warrant in Rome, addressing the question of criminal liability of the provider, has been acquitted by the actors who had provided computer services to a site with content presumptively illegal. Computer Point speaks with his lawyer Fulvio Sarzana di S. Ippolito, a lawyer representing one of two providers.

Point Computer : As the novelty of the Judgement of GIP in Rome?

Fulvio Sarzana : The award of the GIP of Rome is in the field of criminal liability of the provider, the first known in Italy in the previous proceedings which are clearly enshrined in the absence of accountability of the same provider for the activities placed to be the owner of a website that displays content on the network capable of configuring a crime. There have been other civil proceedings in the past who had "touched" the matter from a different perspective, the civil law.
Another important principle that is reflected by the measure is that the owners of sites that place advertising banners of sites that may violate criminal laws can not respond by way of participation in the crime. The difference with the past is of course in the different impact that a criminal sentence (so far unique) may have regard to the principles laid down by the Courts and Civil nell'ausilio that the measure would give to those who are involved in events with implications penalisitici.

PI: How did the judicial process and how did it come to this decision?

FS: The decision not to prosecute is was issued after the preliminary hearing and provided the acquittal of the Provider who provided hosting services, maintenance and support services to the site due to alleged sexual services online, and that he had registered the domain name of the site and had hosted a banner ad on their site due to the offending site. This is the first published decision that sets out clearly, a criminal law perspective, the lack of responsibility of the telematics service provider (whether an entity that registers domain, which provides web space or putting banner ads on your site ) for crimes committed by the owner of a website.

PI: What are the salient points of the sentence?

FS: Regarding the placement of responsibility on the banner has expressly ruled that the sentence "is irrelevant (for the contest in protest of the offense) a reference to the informative advertising insertion PG Company XXXX due xxxxxx accused or the site does not fall on the criminal act carried out in the specific subject of imputation. "
In the liability of hosting provider has expressly stated that the sentence "must reach a similar conclusion in relation to the co-defendant, not being identified specific elements of connection between the company and the site xxx xxxxxx such conclude that there is a competition of the latter in the activity carried out by co-defendant, not resulting in particular, the existence of a profit statement for the first associated with the use of the site and offered the girls and being limited in its activities to support and maintenance of web space granted to customers; follows the finding of not pursued for lack of fact. "

PI: The ruling appears to establish the criminal liability of providers under competition only in cases where there is was a direct economic participation in profits linked to the site, right?

FS: The ruling, interpreting for the first time in a criminal provisions of Legislative Decree no. April 9, 2003, 70 of which serves as reference standards in defining the grounds for criminal liability of the provider, said the principle according to which the provider can not be considered responsible participation in the crime unless it is shown that has had a direct economic benefit from the activities on the site charged.
In this respect, the decision seems to go well beyond the legal provisions already mentioned that, because of a provider's obligation to prior surveillance activities carried out by the owner of a site outside his trade, however canonize the responsibility of the provider that is actually aware that activity or information is illegal, and not just aware of these facts, upon request of the competent authorities, does not act expeditiously to remove or disable access to information. According to the GIP
so just basically proof of the absolute strangeness of the provider to the activities of the owner to exclude the criminal liability of the entrepreneur "cybercrime". To establish the responsibility then you must be a direct benefit because otherwise, as it is in the profit that is obtained by the banners, there is liability in the competition. So if the provider or owner of the site earnings generated in the provision of services, without participating in the profits of the owner, in principle, and, according to the reconstruction of the GIP, it should be held accountable.

PI: What impact will this measure be the judge of Rome (and any others which may follow) on the ongoing discussion in Parliament and not the liability of providers for crimes committed by users?

FS: The ruling is highly significant because it interprets correctly the Community and national rules on liability of intermediaries, excluding root "drift" of the restrictive rules that the provider would take the form of "policeman of the network " and that in recent months have resulted in a number of measures presented to the Chambers, notes bills until the bill Carlucci Barbareschi.