VENETA vs FUTSAL. BFT
5-5
5-5
markers: Boscolo, Buonocore, Boscolo, Daniel, Pezzani
If these are the premises, 2010 will be a difficult year, especially if we are sticking to the playoff train. The return after the holidays, in fact, was more complicated than it did guess the standings. Futsal Veneto has proved a very well organized team, not individuality that stands out from the collective (however good level) and has a great race. The pace has always been high, also because of the small size of the pitch and both teams took the field played futsal at a level more than decent. In the first half we were Bravini from. It is true that our opponents have begun to run until the second half, have always been very mobile and fast, just in the first half we defended with great care and even when the changes have been made have not seen any difference. The first 5 minutes of recovery were, on the contrary, a nightmare. We have suffered three goals in quick succession, two of which were of great goals, we have actually in danger of making a sound rectified. But we did well to regroup, to recall that there were good ideas in the first half, and we straightened out the game. As it had started (under 2 goals a quarter of an hour from the end) it makes a point gained rather than two points lost. My impression is that there are less deserving teams Veneta Futsal much higher in the standings. Next week we're going to pay a visit to the Spartak Mestre Stefanini: once this race alone was worth half a season. The other half consisted of the return match. Now things have changed, we find ourselves in front after a year off a team that contends profoundly changed the first-place playoff train follower: there should therefore be a great performance by everyone because the league is very balanced and missteps are absolutely welcome.
ANO: 7 vote in the first half has much to do, but when called into question by responding sample, the output at the lower edge of the area is crucial and prevents a goal from almost done at a sleep colossal defense. It takes 4 other but not to blame: they are comrades who betrayed him and he can only watch dumbfounded
GIORGIO: 6.5 vote had said that it would serve a defender physically strong: here it is. Against very physical opponents and does not save when the door with everyone. On setting not you fall in love with him ever, but at least has the merit of not committing unforced errors. Try to sting with conclusions from a distance, but the goalkeeper is always vigilant. Macchia his performance with the first few minutes of the restart, when it sinks with all his teammates. In the final yellow must spend wisely concrete
TOSO: vo to 6 is king st to the rough 'or url d the or gi, l' ap Oteo you s ta be reached nd p pr or rio gra aunts to p ver inactive tense of bo m be r. P etc. ato c he co nclu by qu she eg netraz ion and a smart with a truck or some tent and syrup but t c entr to and The in ves if cic cat a bit 'is Maremma SCRi or vend' s to between tor ia. P arts ta d in a solid to IFES, will not à Pinturicchio (the temperature nice pi) n on but you only camp in dormice gori to a step of the vet ta
TRACK: 5.5 votes part owner on the strip, a little too shy. We test out the aims but does not belong to his vocabulary. He lacks a bit 'of conviction in addition, sometimes it seems almost afraid to make mistakes, and is limited so do the homework. It 'still the only one to always carry the block and position themselves properly on the diagonal. E 'in the field in those famous 5 minutes of shooting when we loaded water from all sides, he seems to have got crabs ... lost
ROB: 5 vote as often happens when the cold comes, the reaction normal would enter the field with a knotty stick to give the alarm. Play 10 minutes of the first half, during which they can adapt to the penetration power of the opponent. It would have a couple of good chances on the counterattack: wasted shuffling the first peak is walled by a recovery on the second PRO-DI-GIO-SO opponent of the number 13 (the strongest). In the second half play another 5 minutes combines plentiful but not much. It will be the back pain ... lazy
PIECE: 6.5 votes his game is the paradigm of his game: you would be kicking him (and I bet there would be a row ...) when it fails to punishment by excellent location, in an attempt awkward to surprise the opponent, at the risk of being duped as well. But then how can you resist and do not hug him when he finds a balanced position by angolatissima? joys and sorrows
PANDA: 5.5 vote is not the usual Panda, what constitutes an irreplaceable pillar of BFT. Even the goal of robbery, while important, is almost disgusting. He began losing ball as a GP last man any less evil that has Ano (in all senses). After an initial blaze in which gains many fouls, you lose the distance in the attack. Behind you feel tight spaces but not help him as he would like to share. At the beginning of this recovery is evil, but the desire to play is too much. It will be for the dizziness that you forget the 8 to the center that marks the developments of a 5-4 corner unrecognizable
STEFANO: 7.5 vote remains the most prolific player of the BFT, it two other marks that will count for the win, but pay at least half a point gained. This is because our third goal, in addition to being well-made (on the development of a powerful left corner), it was also important for the delicate moment in which he arrived: he gave us the road to recovery. Suffering from physical opponents, although physically and well put. But technology does not always have the upper hand. constant efficiency
BEPPE: 6.5 vote of liberation! It took 10 games to review a smile on his lips: you know that the goal is everything for an attacker, if there is that one can not be met. Yet the premises were not the best, just think of the occasion wasted face to face with the goalkeeper in the first half time. Found the goals of the momentary 2-0 leaves finally going to rein and shows some of his numbers. Dribbling and dribbling and then again against dribble, then one dribbling. Finally, an attempt to dribble ended a dribble. And pulling it seems bad? resurrected
ANO: 7 vote in the first half has much to do, but when called into question by responding sample, the output at the lower edge of the area is crucial and prevents a goal from almost done at a sleep colossal defense. It takes 4 other but not to blame: they are comrades who betrayed him and he can only watch dumbfounded
GIORGIO: 6.5 vote had said that it would serve a defender physically strong: here it is. Against very physical opponents and does not save when the door with everyone. On setting not you fall in love with him ever, but at least has the merit of not committing unforced errors. Try to sting with conclusions from a distance, but the goalkeeper is always vigilant. Macchia his performance with the first few minutes of the restart, when it sinks with all his teammates. In the final yellow must spend wisely concrete
TOSO: vo to 6 is king st to the rough 'or url d the or gi, l' ap Oteo you s ta be reached nd p pr or rio gra aunts to p ver inactive tense of bo m be r. P etc. ato c he co nclu by qu she eg netraz ion and a smart with a truck or some tent and syrup but t c entr to and The in ves if cic cat a bit 'is Maremma SCRi or vend' s to between tor ia. P arts ta d in a solid to IFES, will not à Pinturicchio (the temperature nice pi) n on but you only camp in dormice gori to a step of the vet ta
TRACK: 5.5 votes part owner on the strip, a little too shy. We test out the aims but does not belong to his vocabulary. He lacks a bit 'of conviction in addition, sometimes it seems almost afraid to make mistakes, and is limited so do the homework. It 'still the only one to always carry the block and position themselves properly on the diagonal. E 'in the field in those famous 5 minutes of shooting when we loaded water from all sides, he seems to have got crabs ... lost
ROB: 5 vote as often happens when the cold comes, the reaction normal would enter the field with a knotty stick to give the alarm. Play 10 minutes of the first half, during which they can adapt to the penetration power of the opponent. It would have a couple of good chances on the counterattack: wasted shuffling the first peak is walled by a recovery on the second PRO-DI-GIO-SO opponent of the number 13 (the strongest). In the second half play another 5 minutes combines plentiful but not much. It will be the back pain ... lazy
PIECE: 6.5 votes his game is the paradigm of his game: you would be kicking him (and I bet there would be a row ...) when it fails to punishment by excellent location, in an attempt awkward to surprise the opponent, at the risk of being duped as well. But then how can you resist and do not hug him when he finds a balanced position by angolatissima? joys and sorrows
PANDA: 5.5 vote is not the usual Panda, what constitutes an irreplaceable pillar of BFT. Even the goal of robbery, while important, is almost disgusting. He began losing ball as a GP last man any less evil that has Ano (in all senses). After an initial blaze in which gains many fouls, you lose the distance in the attack. Behind you feel tight spaces but not help him as he would like to share. At the beginning of this recovery is evil, but the desire to play is too much. It will be for the dizziness that you forget the 8 to the center that marks the developments of a 5-4 corner unrecognizable
STEFANO: 7.5 vote remains the most prolific player of the BFT, it two other marks that will count for the win, but pay at least half a point gained. This is because our third goal, in addition to being well-made (on the development of a powerful left corner), it was also important for the delicate moment in which he arrived: he gave us the road to recovery. Suffering from physical opponents, although physically and well put. But technology does not always have the upper hand. constant efficiency
BEPPE: 6.5 vote of liberation! It took 10 games to review a smile on his lips: you know that the goal is everything for an attacker, if there is that one can not be met. Yet the premises were not the best, just think of the occasion wasted face to face with the goalkeeper in the first half time. Found the goals of the momentary 2-0 leaves finally going to rein and shows some of his numbers. Dribbling and dribbling and then again against dribble, then one dribbling. Finally, an attempt to dribble ended a dribble. And pulling it seems bad? resurrected
0 comments:
Post a Comment