DUFF vs HEROES. BFT
2 to 4.5
SCORERS: a Panda, an own goal, 1 George, 1 / 2 Boscolo, Boscolo 1
Morin At the BFT just can not express the usual level , there is little to be done. Since the rate of our technical team is high, the small fields there are less congenial. We can not make the team move because there is no time to think and opponents put us in trouble when they apply a careful pressing. In fact yesterday playing ball on the ground we made a great effort to break through and two of the four total goals came when we started doing the simple things: with two or three touches at most, if done at speed, the opponents were in trouble, otherwise it was much more difficult to hunt them preferring the movement of the ball. Accomplices the small size of the field and the determination demonstrated by the heroes, for most of the very first time we struggled to find outlets. Add to this the lack of attention fielded in the first 15 minutes, leaving a dark picture: Heroes Duff deservedly went ahead on two goals to zero, except that fortunately for us in the long run output is higher and our technique our ability to close the spaces when they are defending a good man with concentration. Too bad the first goal: sleep colossal of all the outfield players, less serious than the second, even if we find the facts unbalanced. Fortunately, the opponents have not found the 3-0, otherwise it would be hard done by then ... we did well to keep us calm and recover. In the second half we were superior and we created many chances, most of which are foiled by the excellent goalkeeper. And here let me make one comment: surely their goalie played well, but I feel that the reason was ours. Let me explain: I do not think has done absolute miracles, if anything, has been consistent in performance and did not make unforced errors, which is already so much to this level. But on several occasions we were to shoot us chickens our own conclusions on him, making him do the figure of the phenomenon. Latest
arbitrage considerations: that official has undoubtedly gaps, and the knowledge of the regulation is the ability to make decisions quickly and coolly. I am convinced that in many cases whistles at random, after inventing the reason why he whistled. Then we must add that he likes so much to the protagonist, it always speaks with the bench, joking, laughing, when one would probably benefit everyone if we focus more on its task. The expulsion of Ano was only the tip of the iceberg of its uncertainties. We have to suffer, and above all we have to make the best of a bad hire as a personal duel there would hardly be beneficial since the only thing we need is fairness. I believe that the intervention of Ano deserved the yellow, not a heavier punishment because his opponent had brought the ball to the outside and thus becomes difficult to see a clear chance on goal. Let us see it as a coup de theater made to call attention to itself in the public and players, a bit 'as he wanted to say, "Hey, guys, I'm here too."
L '"excessive force" with which he was sentenced Stephen is an absolute masterpiece, if only for the definition of search for'.
But all this talk should not divert attention from the basic fact: we have allowed an opponent that they are all alone (as his back to goal) against our goalie, who was forced to shoot it down with a tactical foul. So before the failure of the referee there was our mistake.
ANO: 5 vote until the twenty-fifth, and ten seconds his game would be at least 7, because at the time of the two goals is not to blame and other interventions proven to be safe, without being called upon to perform miracles. Unfortunately at the end loses his head split with an intervention, in a slip, cursing and without complying with the distances on the lineout. Ends a clear scoring chances and we are left at the next crucial game against Nicoteam B irresponsible
GIORGIO: 7.5 votes part owner in central defense in the first minutes and want to show first of all reason. But something must be wrong if there beaks two goals within six minutes. Marks the most important goal of the match with a strut bully off guard, the goal that finally directs the game in the right direction. In the final heats so much that it would seem that expelled him relentless
TOSO: 5.5 votes eager to do well in front of some friends, good part load off the bench and proves that you can defend with caution when the 'opponent is not the phenomenon of the moment. It goes a bit 'in trouble in containing the opponent's number eight, but never collapses. The good captain on two occasions, one on the right and left on an even more inviting, but wasted both badly. It 's a great pity because it means a lot to be cynical. Means more vote for the expulsion despite having escaped bestemmione a sound pronounced with the referee in front pardoned
ROB: 6.5 votes part to help out mates who are serving some people are missing: autonomy is what it is, while the intensity is the same as always: as long as the lungs hold, causes difficulties for the opposing defense with its fast raids. Causes own goal with a cross between a shot and a cross. Could mark one of its own if only to listen to advice from the bench and remained on the pole on the development of a second punishment there are none so deaf ....
GP: vote 6 play from the tip of the first 6 minutes of recovery. Opposite is a top rated defense that kicks in football, and is known as to when the door is not exactly your passion. Although this keeps more alive than usual attack and try to bite off guard with a strut, the side not by much. Chills spread along the backs of his companions when he decides to soar in mid-field and put the ball in the corner of his head. Nobody could imagine that you would actually throw it forward discrete
PANDA: vote 8 the first half of the first half was the worst part of our game, and it is only because of its solidity that withstands the BFT without suffering too much. Fight like a man possessed in midfield, stealing balls in quantity and almost single-handedly keeping busy defending hosts. Scored the first goal of the BFT with great determination, then it will always walled. Try to surprise the goalkeeper with a lob pretentious but never forgets what is the reality Solid
BEPPE: 7.5 vote marks but does not score, providing a delightful first assist with George. Try several times, but prefers the power of the conclusion to the accuracy, using it as a great figure at the goalkeeper. Mend the breach with the Company after the outburst of the week before, proves valuable
STEFANO: 6.5 votes the news is that it marks only one. It does not appear in one of his best nights, possibly thanks to the opponents they allocate to him and Panda personalized treatments marking. In the first half was unlucky when his lash on the distance laps the pole and is the most important thing keeping the ball in the middle area waiting for the good moment to pass companion bag. In the second half was walled up several times by enemy defenders and only time in the second half is the goal of security, a conclusion with accurate and powerful shot from a tight angle. Is targeted by the referee because he talks too talkative
2 to 4.5
SCORERS: a Panda, an own goal, 1 George, 1 / 2 Boscolo, Boscolo 1
Morin At the BFT just can not express the usual level , there is little to be done. Since the rate of our technical team is high, the small fields there are less congenial. We can not make the team move because there is no time to think and opponents put us in trouble when they apply a careful pressing. In fact yesterday playing ball on the ground we made a great effort to break through and two of the four total goals came when we started doing the simple things: with two or three touches at most, if done at speed, the opponents were in trouble, otherwise it was much more difficult to hunt them preferring the movement of the ball. Accomplices the small size of the field and the determination demonstrated by the heroes, for most of the very first time we struggled to find outlets. Add to this the lack of attention fielded in the first 15 minutes, leaving a dark picture: Heroes Duff deservedly went ahead on two goals to zero, except that fortunately for us in the long run output is higher and our technique our ability to close the spaces when they are defending a good man with concentration. Too bad the first goal: sleep colossal of all the outfield players, less serious than the second, even if we find the facts unbalanced. Fortunately, the opponents have not found the 3-0, otherwise it would be hard done by then ... we did well to keep us calm and recover. In the second half we were superior and we created many chances, most of which are foiled by the excellent goalkeeper. And here let me make one comment: surely their goalie played well, but I feel that the reason was ours. Let me explain: I do not think has done absolute miracles, if anything, has been consistent in performance and did not make unforced errors, which is already so much to this level. But on several occasions we were to shoot us chickens our own conclusions on him, making him do the figure of the phenomenon. Latest
arbitrage considerations: that official has undoubtedly gaps, and the knowledge of the regulation is the ability to make decisions quickly and coolly. I am convinced that in many cases whistles at random, after inventing the reason why he whistled. Then we must add that he likes so much to the protagonist, it always speaks with the bench, joking, laughing, when one would probably benefit everyone if we focus more on its task. The expulsion of Ano was only the tip of the iceberg of its uncertainties. We have to suffer, and above all we have to make the best of a bad hire as a personal duel there would hardly be beneficial since the only thing we need is fairness. I believe that the intervention of Ano deserved the yellow, not a heavier punishment because his opponent had brought the ball to the outside and thus becomes difficult to see a clear chance on goal. Let us see it as a coup de theater made to call attention to itself in the public and players, a bit 'as he wanted to say, "Hey, guys, I'm here too."
L '"excessive force" with which he was sentenced Stephen is an absolute masterpiece, if only for the definition of search for'.
But all this talk should not divert attention from the basic fact: we have allowed an opponent that they are all alone (as his back to goal) against our goalie, who was forced to shoot it down with a tactical foul. So before the failure of the referee there was our mistake.
ANO: 5 vote until the twenty-fifth, and ten seconds his game would be at least 7, because at the time of the two goals is not to blame and other interventions proven to be safe, without being called upon to perform miracles. Unfortunately at the end loses his head split with an intervention, in a slip, cursing and without complying with the distances on the lineout. Ends a clear scoring chances and we are left at the next crucial game against Nicoteam B irresponsible
GIORGIO: 7.5 votes part owner in central defense in the first minutes and want to show first of all reason. But something must be wrong if there beaks two goals within six minutes. Marks the most important goal of the match with a strut bully off guard, the goal that finally directs the game in the right direction. In the final heats so much that it would seem that expelled him relentless
TOSO: 5.5 votes eager to do well in front of some friends, good part load off the bench and proves that you can defend with caution when the 'opponent is not the phenomenon of the moment. It goes a bit 'in trouble in containing the opponent's number eight, but never collapses. The good captain on two occasions, one on the right and left on an even more inviting, but wasted both badly. It 's a great pity because it means a lot to be cynical. Means more vote for the expulsion despite having escaped bestemmione a sound pronounced with the referee in front pardoned
ROB: 6.5 votes part to help out mates who are serving some people are missing: autonomy is what it is, while the intensity is the same as always: as long as the lungs hold, causes difficulties for the opposing defense with its fast raids. Causes own goal with a cross between a shot and a cross. Could mark one of its own if only to listen to advice from the bench and remained on the pole on the development of a second punishment there are none so deaf ....
GP: vote 6 play from the tip of the first 6 minutes of recovery. Opposite is a top rated defense that kicks in football, and is known as to when the door is not exactly your passion. Although this keeps more alive than usual attack and try to bite off guard with a strut, the side not by much. Chills spread along the backs of his companions when he decides to soar in mid-field and put the ball in the corner of his head. Nobody could imagine that you would actually throw it forward discrete
PANDA: vote 8 the first half of the first half was the worst part of our game, and it is only because of its solidity that withstands the BFT without suffering too much. Fight like a man possessed in midfield, stealing balls in quantity and almost single-handedly keeping busy defending hosts. Scored the first goal of the BFT with great determination, then it will always walled. Try to surprise the goalkeeper with a lob pretentious but never forgets what is the reality Solid
BEPPE: 7.5 vote marks but does not score, providing a delightful first assist with George. Try several times, but prefers the power of the conclusion to the accuracy, using it as a great figure at the goalkeeper. Mend the breach with the Company after the outburst of the week before, proves valuable
STEFANO: 6.5 votes the news is that it marks only one. It does not appear in one of his best nights, possibly thanks to the opponents they allocate to him and Panda personalized treatments marking. In the first half was unlucky when his lash on the distance laps the pole and is the most important thing keeping the ball in the middle area waiting for the good moment to pass companion bag. In the second half was walled up several times by enemy defenders and only time in the second half is the goal of security, a conclusion with accurate and powerful shot from a tight angle. Is targeted by the referee because he talks too talkative
0 comments:
Post a Comment